Reward or punishment Essay

The right to heart and lordliness are the most important of all human rights and this must be demonstrated by the state in everything that it does, including the direction it punishes iniquitouss. Justice Arthur Chask in additionn. The finis penalisation is considered, the legal punishment for a felonious. Although the demolition punishment has been employ for many years, the thought of it continues to bring shivers down the back of most of order of magnitude. flat though there has been an abundant of debates whether it should be abolished or not, citizens do not really know the facts behind it. Most of the society assumes that the death penalisation is less expensive than bread and simplyter in put to sleep without parole. United States citizens view that this punishment will eliminate any revenge thoughts and therefore outgrowth public safety. Being a factor of death, it should not be taken as lightly as it has been. Although sentencing the death penalization may depend the proportional punishment to a brutal crime, it is not a skinny alternative, because the cost of execution hurts our parsimony, it inadequacys blockage for victims, and it violates the U. S. Constitution. Most of society assumes that the death penalisation is less expensive than to keep a criminal in jail for behavior. Little did they know that it actually costs the U.S. less for a criminal to live in prison than to be executed. According to Dellapiana author of Should We gear up the Death Penalty on the Chopping Block? not exclusively is there cost for pre-trials, trials and courts but there is additional costs aggregateing to $4.2 Million per death penalty (Dellapiana 1).It is full(prenominal) priced because the consequences or error and procedural unfairness are magnified when life is in the balance thus, courts have imposed caustic due process protections. (Dellapiana 1) Being in really tough sparing times, wasting all that money on the death penalty seems inappropriate. alto lether that money wasted on absenting someone, could might as well be used somewhere else in a productive manner. Dieter entrusts and states the death penalty in the U.S. is an enormously expensive and wasteful program with no pop off benefits. all in all of the studies on the cost of capital punishment conclude it is often more expensive than asystem with life sentences as the maximum penalty. (Dieter 2). The money accrued to be used in the death penalty is desperately mandatory in other important programs. For example, In Florida, the courts have lost 10% of their funding, with another cut expected, as home fore resolvings accelerated. Philadelphia is leaving 200 law positions unfilled. In New Hampshire, civil and criminal jury trials were halted for a calendar month to save money in one county, 77 criminal trials were decelerate for up to six months. (Dieter 12).Clearly showing the United States is greatly affected by the death penalty. By the absence of the money needed for jobs, it has been labored to cut jobs strongly needed to protect society. As it can be seen, all the money spent on the death penalty is crucially affecting the economy. The process of following through the death penalty is lengthy an entire appeal process can take more than 15 years before executions take place and in some cases it neer goes through. Sentences or convictions can be reversed, defendants may die of natural causes or suicide, governors occasionally grant clemency, and entire statutes can be overturned by the courts. (Dieter 28). Meaning, most of the sentences adoptt result in an execution, which only consumed an blown-up amount of money when the process is over. Not only is the appeal high priced, pre-trials and trials only add much more money to the high amount already accumulated. Instead of finding a more appropriate approach, society spends millions of dollars into a system that doesnt produce results. Although many citizens do believe the death penalty is effective, they also believe the price is worth it. This is because life is invaluable there is no amount of money or prison that could equal it (Roberts Cady 3).Taking away their freedom is a way of restraining their righteous manner in society. Because the wrongdoers had unfairly gained an extra measure of freedom from lesson restraint, the natural way to restore a fair balance is to tailor the protection he ordinarily would have gained through moral restraints on the conduct of others. By treating the wrongdoer in what is ordinarily a nix way, we strip away part of the protection that moral restraints on behavior would ordinarily have afforded him. Thus, we remove precisely the sort of advantages he has gained. (Roberts- Cady 3). A punishment is supposed to make the criminal reflect on their wrongdoing and get them on the right path. But why give the criminal the easy way out. Although many citizens believe in the saying an marrow for aneye th e death penalty does not necessarily bring closure to the victims family. Because of the extensive constitutional due process requirements in death penalty litigation, trials are lengthy, and appeals can go on for decades, for families of victims, there is no closure.(Dellapiana 5). keep sentencing with no parole is a much faster process and ensures closure to the victims family.For most of the victims families, the death penalty is a punishment that is justified because it is a reward or an easy way out for wrongdoing (Roberts Cady 2). Not only does it lack closure to the victims families but it isnt morally acceptable. This is because if life has unconditional, incomparable worth, hence we cannot and should not compare the worth of one persons life with that of another (Roberts-Cady 4).Taking the life of the murderer will not be the same as taking the life of the victim. For example, taking the murders life by injection cant be brutally similar to taking the life of the victi m. Some citizens believe the death penalty as punishment does provide closure. Many families consider this as closure because the murder has been killed. But as Roberts Cady states Taking the murders life cannot be said to be even roughly resembling to taking the life of the victim. (Roberts- Cady 4) If it is not equivalent why not let them suffer in prison. Although life is the biggest boon one could ever have, many criminals prefer death rather than to get life sentenced. So why give them what they prefer? And, who are the decide to decide who deserves to live and who deserves to die? Although many citizens believe the death penalty is a logical punishment, it violates the United States Constitution. The death penalty goes against the Eight Amendment in which it states it prohibits the use of cruel and un unwashed or excessive punishment.Thus, this amendment protects the criminal from receiving a punishment that can be considered comparable to the pain caused to the victim. The death penalty easily violates this amendment because it is cruel and unusual punishment since the result is death. Not only does it violate the United States Constitution it also violates the Declaration of Independence which says All men are created equal. It also violates this because of the discrimination by the attempt and courts. An example is in case DeLuna v. The State of Texas (1986). In this prejudiced case, Carlos DeLuna was an American Hispanic who was put to death even though he was innocent. DeLuna was convicted of murdering a convenience store clerk,Lopez. Although all assumptions pointed towards DeLuna, he was innocent. DeLuna repeatedly stated his honor and stated the real killer was Carlos Hernandez. The judge discriminated him for being Hispanic, neglected to attend to his statements, nonetheless he claimed calling Hernandez a phantom and figment of DeLunas imagination. After being wrongfully executed, a professor and five of his students undefendable the case causing questions to rise and evidence to be found. The re-opening of this case showed meddling evidence. Hernandez already had a criminal record for being a repeatedly violent offender and known for slashing women. As the case was ongoing, law of nature tampered the evidence.For example, as the investigation was occurring the police said they couldnt find a Carlos Hernandez with a criminal record despite his long rap sheet. There was also a bloody foot print outside the store which was never processed. The judge was influenced by his ethnicity and appearance. He looked like the criminal, therefore for the judge, he was the criminal. Nor the judge or the court gave DeLuna the opportunity to prove himself innocent. Many people dont categorize the death penalty as cruel and usual punishment therefore, it does not violate the Eight Amendment. According to the dictionary, cruelty way of life causing somebody to feel pain or suffer. The Eight Amendment does not specify if emotion is p art of this law. Death penalty should not be used to punish our society. It has been clearly explained how the death penalty is ineffective. A right impact will continue to be seen throughout the United States economy if the death penalty is not abolished. It would take years for victims families to find the ease needed for closure. Death penalty does not only violate the U.S., but it violates The Declaration of Independence as well. As stated, it is proven the death penalty is not a good punishment but an easy way out therefore Our country will never gain repose if we are killing our own citizens.