Book Review of The Face of Battle by John Keegan Essay -- essays resea

THE FACE OF BATTLEJohn Keegan, the motive of The Face of Battle is allowing the reader to view different perspective of history, from the eye of the soldier. Although by his own account, Keegan acknowledges, I have never been in a battle. And I grow increasingly convinced that I have rattling little idea of what a battle can be like. Keegan scorns historians for poseing the riffle of failure after an evolution occurs and not examining the soldiers point of view while the battle is transpiring. Keegan chooses the three well documented campaigns of Agincourt in 1415, Waterloo in 1815, and Somme in 1916 to answer the question of his thesis To find emerge how men who are prospectd with the threat of single-missile and multiple-missile weapons control their fears, fix their wounds, and face their death. In his words he is seeking to catch a coup doeil of the face of battle. The first chapter of his book titled Old, Unhappy, Far-off Things gives Keegans acknowledgement to the fact that historians do not focus enough on material soldiers. To explain this further, what Keegan is saying is that a historian puts things in a acquire of sequential dates and times but to the soldier, these things happen very rapidly and more times without planning. Keegan continues on to make note that when a historian puts unitedly the pain-staking task of compilation of facts, the information is put down on newspaper publisher as the writers view of how the facts unfolded and not from the soldiers perspective....